<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</description>
        <dc:date>2010-01-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/1/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/4/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/1/1/10">
        <title>Avian influenza: an osteopathic component to treatment</title>
        <description>Avian influenza is an infection caused by the H5N1 virus. The infection is highly contagious among birds, and only a few known cases of human avian influenza have been documented. However, healthcare experts around the world are concerned that mutation or genetic exchange with more commonly transmitted human influenza viruses could result in a pandemic of avian influenza. Their concern remains in spite of the fact that the first United States vaccine against the H5N1 virus was recently approved. Under these circumstances the fear is that a pandemic of avian influenza could result in the kind of mortality that was seen with the Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918&#8211;1919, where the number of deaths was estimated to be as high as 40 million people.Retrospective data gathered by the American Osteopathic Association shortly after the 1918&#8211;1919 influenza pandemic have suggested that osteopathic physicians (DOs), using their distinctive osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) methods, observed significantly lower morbidity and mortality among their patients as compared to those treated by allopathic physicians (MDs) with standard medical care available at the time. In light of the limited prevention and treatment options available, it seems logical that a preparedness plan for the treatment of avian influenza should include these OMT procedures, provided by DOs and other healthcare workers capable of being trained to perform these therapeutic interventions. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the characteristics of avian influenza, describe the success of DOs during the 1918&#8211;1919 Spanish influenza pandemic, describe the evidence base for the inclusion of OMT as part of the preparedness plan for the treatment of avian influenza, and describe some of the specific OMT procedures that could be utilized as part of the treatment protocol for avian influenza patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/1/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Raymond Hruby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keasha Hoffman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2007, 1:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-1-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/4">
        <title>Spinal and sacroiliac assessment and treatment techniques used by osteopathic physicians in the United States</title>
        <description>Background:
Osteopathic manipulative medicine texts and educators advocate a range of approaches for physical assessment and treatment, but little is known about their use by osteopathic physicians in the United States.
Methods:
A web-based survey using a 5-point Likert scale was developed and e-mailed to 777 practicing osteopathic physician members of the American Academy of Osteopathy. Responses in the &quot;frequently&quot; and &quot;always&quot; categories were combined for reporting purposes. Friedman tests were used to analyze the reported usage of each item. The effect of gender was analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests.
Results:
One hundred seventy-one osteopathic physicians completed the survey (22%). For the assessment of spinal somatic dysfunction, paraspinal tissue texture (98%), transverse process asymmetry (89%), and tenderness (85%) were most commonly reported. Myofascial release (78%), soft tissue technique (77%), and patient self-stretches (71%) were most commonly used for treatment of the spine. For assessment of pelvic landmark asymmetry, the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS, 87%), sacral base (82%), posterior superior iliac spine (81%), sacral sulci (78%), iliac crests (77%), and inferior lateral angle of the sacrum (74%) were commonly palpated. For assessment of sacroiliac joint motion, ASIS compression (68%) was most commonly used. Sacroiliac pain provocation tests were also employed although their use was less common than asymmetry or motion tests. Muscle energy (70%), myofascial release (67%), patient self-stretches (66%), osteopathy in the cranial field (59%), muscle strengthening exercises (58%), soft tissue technique (58%), and articulatory technique (53%) were most commonly used for treatment of the pelvis and sacroiliac. The effect of gender was significant for many of the treatment procedures, with females using more soft tissue and muscle energy and males more high-velocity techniques. The majority of respondents document the types of osteopathic manipulative techniques used (83%), document somatic dysfunction with Fryette nomenclature (64%), and bill for osteopathic manipulative treatment (92%).
Conclusion:
Respondents reported the use of a broad range of assessment and treatment approaches. Results suggest a higher use of myofascial release and cranial technique and lower use of high-velocity techniques in this group of physicians compared to previous studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Gary Fryer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Morse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/8">
        <title>Assessment of calvarial structure motion by MRI</title>
        <description>Background:
Practitioners of manual medicine/manual therapy (MM/MT) who utilize techniques thought to have some impact upon and move the solid structures of the human head have been criticized for lack of evidence of cranial bone motion. The present study utilized magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) technology to address the question of whether or not inherent (non-operator initiated) calvarial structure motion can be assessed.
Methods:
Subjects: Twenty healthcare professionals, (physicians, nurses, medical students, pharmacists) between the ages of 24 and 52 were recruited. Seven females (ages 25-47, mean age 36.7) and 13 males (ages 25-53, mean age 31.2) volunteered. Technology: MRI scans were acquired at 450 ms per slice, in a 1.5 Tesla Signa Excite HD closed MRI system. The same scan prescription was repeated serially every 45 seconds to obtain eight serial slices for each subject. Image analysis was accomplished using ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.33 u National Institutes of Health, USA). Data from all eight images for each of the 20 subjects were analyzed to determine the two images with the largest differences in the parameters measured.
Results:
Difference values for the measures of area, width, height, major axis, and feret were statistically different whereas the measures for perimeter and minor axis were not. However, only the difference values for area were both statistically different (p &lt; 0.003) and exceeded the resolution threshold of 0.898 mm/pixel.DiscussionThe statistically significant difference value for area is suggestive of inherent motion in calvarial structures, and adds to the body of evidence supportive of biomechanically measurable calvarial structure motion in general. That the total intracranial area appeared to expand and recede was consistent with theory and prior studies suggestive of calvarial structure motion due to intracranial fluid volume changes.
Conclusion:
The use of MRI technology was able to demonstrate calvarial structure motion at a level exceeding the resolution threshold, and provides a means for further research on phenomena related to the cranial concept. It may be just a matter of time until increased resolution of MRI technology and image analysis provide the ability to examine more detailed areas of specific cranial bone motion.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>William Crow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hollis King</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rita Patterson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincent Giuliano</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/9">
        <title>The immediate effect of individual manipulation techniques on pulmonary function measures in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title>
        <description>Background:
The use of manipulation has long been advocated in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but few randomized controlled clinical trials have measured the effect of manipulation on pulmonary function. In addition, the effects of individual manipulative techniques on the pulmonary system are poorly understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of four osteopathic techniques on pulmonary function measures in persons with COPD relative to a minimal-touch control protocol.
Methods:
Persons with COPD aged 50 and over were recruited for the study. Subjects received five, single-technique treatment sessions: minimal-touch control, thoracic lymphatic pump (TLP) with activation, TLP without activation, rib raising, and myofascial release. There was a 4-week washout period between sessions. Protocols were given in random order until all five techniques had been administered. Pulmonary function measures were obtained at baseline and 30-minutes posttreatment. For the actual pulmonary function measures and percent predicted values, Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to test within-technique changes from baseline. For the percent change from baseline, Friedman tests were used to test for between-technique differences.
Results:
Twenty-five subjects were enrolled in the study. All four tested osteopathic techniques were associated with adverse posttreatment changes in pulmonary function measures; however, different techniques changed different measures. TLP with activation increased posttreatment residual volume compared to baseline, while TLP without activation did not. Side effects were mild, mostly posttreatment chest wall soreness. Surprisingly, the majority of subjects believed they could breathe better after receiving osteopathic manipulation.
Conclusion:
In persons with COPD, TLP with activation, TLP without activation, rib raising, and myofascial release mildly worsened pulmonary function measures immediately posttreatment relative to baseline measurements. The activation component of the TLP technique appears to increase posttreatment residual volume. Despite adverse changes in pulmonary function measures, persons with COPD subjectively reported they benefited from osteopathic manipulation.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Donald Noll</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Baer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Snider</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care: One journal, two audiences
</title>
        <description>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care (OMPC) enters its fourth year of operation in 2010 under the umbrella of BioMed Central. Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care strives to promote and advance research and scholarly work within the fields of osteopathic medicine and primary care. In so doing, OMPC welcomes submissions from clinicians within both the osteopathic and allopathic medical professions, and from other professionals having interests in primary care, including health care delivery, public health, and evidence-based medicine. Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care offers fair and expeditious peer review (mean time from submission to publication, 118 days), retention of copyright for authors, unlimited online distribution and access without charge to readers, indexing in PubMed, and archiving in PubMed Central. In 2010, there will be an increased availability of waivers or discounts of article processing charges via several mechanisms for eligible authors who submit qualified manuscripts, especially in the field of primary care.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>John Licciardone</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2010, 4:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-4-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/10">
        <title>Biomedical research competencies for osteopathic medical students</title>
        <description>Background:
Without systematic exposure to biomedical research concepts or applications, osteopathic medical students may be generally under-prepared to efficiently consume and effectively apply research and evidence-based medicine information in patient care. The academic literature suggests that although medical residents are increasingly expected to conduct research in their post graduate training specialties, they generally have limited understanding of research concepts.With grant support from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and a grant from the Osteopathic Heritage Foundation, the University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC) is incorporating research education in the osteopathic medical school curriculum. The first phase of this research education project involved a baseline assessment of students&apos; understanding of targeted research concepts. This paper reports the results of that assessment and discusses implications for research education during medical school.
Methods:
Using a novel set of research competencies supported by the literature as needed for understanding research information, we created a questionnaire to measure students&apos; confidence and understanding of selected research concepts. Three matriculating medical school classes completed the on-line questionnaire. Data were analyzed for differences between groups using analysis of variance and t-tests. Correlation coefficients were computed for the confidence and applied understanding measures. We performed a principle component factor analysis of the confidence items, and used multiple regression analyses to explore how confidence might be related to the applied understanding.
Results:
Of 496 total incoming, first, and second year medical students, 354 (71.4%) completed the questionnaire. Incoming students expressed significantly more confidence than first or second year students (F = 7.198, df = 2, 351, P = 0.001) in their ability to understand the research concepts. Factor analyses of the confidence items yielded conceptually coherent groupings. Regression analysis confirmed a relationship between confidence and applied understanding referred to as knowledge. Confidence scores were important in explaining variability in knowledge scores of the respondents.
Conclusion:
Medical students with limited understanding of research concepts may struggle to understand the medical literature. Assessing medical students&apos; confidence to understand and objectively measured ability to interpret basic research concepts can be used to incorporate competency based research material into the existing curriculum.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>des Anges Cruser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Dubin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Brown</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lori Bakken</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Licciardone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Podawiltz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Bulik</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/5">
        <title>OSTEOPAThic Health outcomes In Chronic low back pain: The OSTEOPATHIC Trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and ultrasound physical therapy (UPT) are commonly used for chronic low back pain. Although there is evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis that OMT generally reduces low back pain, there are no large clinical trials that specifically assess OMT efficacy in chronic low back pain. Similarly, there is a lack of evidence involving UPT for chronic low back pain.
Methods:
The OSTEOPAThic Health outcomes In Chronic low back pain (OSTEOPATHIC) Trial is a Phase III randomized controlled trial that seeks to study 488 subjects between August 2006 and June 2010. It uses a 2 &#215; 2 factorial design to independently assess the efficacy of OMT and UPT for chronic low back pain. The primary outcome is a visual analogue scale score for pain. Secondary outcomes include back-specific functioning, generic health, work disability, and satisfaction with back care.
Conclusion:
This randomized controlled trial will potentially be the largest involving OMT. It will provide long awaited data on the efficacy of OMT and UPT for chronic low back pain.Trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00315120</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>John Licciardone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hollis King</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kendi Hensel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dan Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2008, 2:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-04-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-2-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-04-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/11">
        <title>The primary care workforce: a critical element in mending the fractured US health care system</title>
        <description>A focus on the primary care workforce is critical when discussing plans to address the fractured United States health care system. However, we must first address the primary care physician shortage crisis when planning for health care reform which focuses on increasing access to the US population. Initial strategies may include improving reimbursement rates for primary care services, incentivizing medical schools in making primary care training a priority, and developing robust loan-forgiveness programs for those who enter and work in primary care specialties. Planning with congressional representatives about these elements will better ensure sustainable health reform efforts are implemented.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Roberto Cardarelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging and acute low back pain: a pilot study to characterize lumbar muscle activity asymmetries and examine the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment</title>
        <description>Background:
Muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI) measures transverse relaxation time (T2), and allows for determination of the spatial pattern of muscle activation. The purposes of this pilot study were to examine whether MRI-derived T2 or side-to-side differences in T2 (asymmetries) differ in low back muscles between subjects with acute low back pain (LBP) compared to asymptomatic controls, and to determine if a single osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) session alters these T2 properties immediately and 48-hours after treatment.
Methods:
Subjects with non-specific acute LBP (mean score on 1-10 visual analog score = 3.02 &#177; 2.81) and asymptomatic controls (n = 9/group) underwent an MRI, and subsequently the LBP subjects received OMT and then underwent another MRI. The LBP subjects reported back for an additional MRI 48-hours following their initial visit. T2 and T2 asymmetry were calculated from regions of interest for the psoas, quadratus lumborum (QL), multifidus, and iliocostalis lumborum/longissimus thoracis (IL/LT) muscles.
Results:
No differences were observed between the groups when T2 was averaged for the left and right side muscles. However, the QL displayed a significantly greater T2 asymmetry in LBP subjects when compared to controls (29.1 &#177; 4.3 vs. 15.9 &#177; 4.1%; p = 0.05). The psoas muscle also displayed a relatively large, albeit non-significant, mean difference (22.7 &#177; 6.9 vs. 9.5 &#177; 2.8%; p = 0.11). In the subjects with LBP, psoas T2 asymmetry was significantly reduced immediately following OMT (25.3 &#177; 6.9 to 6.1 &#177; 1.8%, p = 0.05), and the change in LBP immediately following OMT was correlated with the change in psoas T2 asymmetry (r = 0.75, p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
Collectively, this pilot work demonstrates the feasibility of mfMRI for quantification and localization of muscle abnormalities in patients with acute low back pain. Additionally, this pilot work provides insight into the mechanistic actions of OMT during acute LBP, as it suggests that it may attenuate muscle activity asymmetries of some of the intrinsic low back muscles.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stevan Walkowski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Conatser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Eland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Howell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2009, 3:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-3-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/8">
        <title>Osteopathy may decrease obstructive apnea in infants: 
a pilot study.
</title>
        <description>Background:
Obstructive apnea is a sleep disorder characterized by pauses in breathing during sleep: breathing is interrupted by a physical block to airflow despite effort. The purpose of this study was to test if osteopathy could influence the incidence of obstructive apnea during sleep in infants.
Methods:
Thirty-four healthy infants (age: 1.5&#8211;4.0 months) were recruited and randomized in two groups; six infants dropped out. The osteopathy treatment group (n = 15 infants) received 2 osteopathic treatments in a period of 2 weeks and a control group (n = 13 infants) received 2 non-specific treatments in the same period of time. The main outcome measure was the change in the number of obstructive apneas measured during an 8-hour polysomnographic recording before and after the two treatment sessions.
Results:
The results of the second polysomnographic recordings showed a significant decrease in the number of obstructive apneas in the osteopathy group (p = 0.01, Wilcoxon test), in comparison to the control group showing only a trend suggesting a gradual physiologic decrease of obstructive apneas. However, the difference in the decline of obstructive apneas between the groups after treatment was not significant (p = 0.43).
Conclusion:
Osteopathy may have a positive influence on the incidence of obstructive apneas during sleep in infants with a previous history of obstructive apneas as measured by polysomnography. Additional research in this area appears warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.om-pc.com/content/2/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Yvan Vandenplas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Etienne Denayer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thierry Vandenbossche</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luc Vermet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruno Hauser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean De Schepper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Agnes Engelen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 2008, 2:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-4732-2-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-4732</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
